/https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/4317807-L.jpg)
An archaeology of West Polynesian prehistory
por
There can be little doubt on linguistic evidence that East Polynesia was first settled from West Polynesia. The author argues, however, that the related archaeological record has been made to fit with this dominant interpretative paradigm. Her objective assessment of …
- ● 73% match for you
- ● history
the long version
There can be little doubt on linguistic evidence that East Polynesia was first settled from West Polynesia. The author argues, however, that the related archaeological record has been made to fit with this dominant interpretative paradigm. Her objective assessment of the material evidence contradicts the popularly held view.
Margaret's verdict
"There can be little doubt on linguistic evidence that East Polynesia was first settled from West Polynesia. The author argues, however, that the related archaeological record has been made to …"
highlights
what readers held onto
No highlights yet. Be the first.
discussion
what readers said
No reviews yet. Finish it; tell us what you found.
/https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/11881150-L.jpg)
/https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/14835842-L.jpg)
/https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/15204638-L.jpg)
/https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/7355968-L.jpg)
/https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/10492586-L.jpg)
/https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/10581887-L.jpg)